Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Last Saturday (Aug. 15) The Guardian featured a story of the poster boy for corruption and greed, Il Duce Trump, WAVING A WASHINGTON POST HEADLINE that proclaimed “Prescription drug prices record sharpest drop in more than 60 years.”

In classic Trumpian fashion, TACO Don tradition, Trump hitched up his Depends and proclaimed the drop in prices was all his doing, failing to mention that the article in reality attributed the decrease to his predecessor, Joe Biden.

It was a staged photo-op and he waved the printout of the headline under the noses of reporters, encouraging the press pool to record and photograph the momentous event for posterity—even though it was not the heralded 1500 percent price decrease he predicted a few months ago (it was actually 3.1 percent for July). “Prescription drug prices down more than at any time over 60 years,” he reiterated. “What else do I have to say?”

Well, what he could have said was the truth, that the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 which required Medicare to negotiate the prices it pays drug companies.

Wait. You mean Medicare could not negotiate prices for drugs the way insurance companies do in the private sector? Why, that’s…that’s outrageous! Why couldn’t that be done?

For that, you can thank former Louisiana Congressman Billy Tauzin who represented Louisiana’s 3rd congressional district from 1980 to 2005. The Chackbay Chameleon switched from Democrat to Repugnantcan in 1995 when the Repugs won control of congress so as not to lose seniority status and in 2004 chose not to run for reelection.

That decision wasn’t because he faced a threat of defeat. It was a financial decision, pure and simple, and we have higher drug prices for Medicare as a result. Of course, with an inability to negotiate on the part of Medicare had the ripple effect of causing higher insurance premiums as well.

So pay attention here. Like any game, politics included, it’s critical to keep your eye on the ball at all times.

You see, Tauzin was seeing dollar signs–big dollar signs–in his future when he made that 2024 announcement that he would not run again. That’s because he had been offered a cushy job of president and CEO of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), beginning the day he left his congressional office in January 2005.

And how did he land such a powerful job? Why, in 2002, while still in office, he was appointed chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Committee which had—and has—jurisdiction over the drug industry and in 2004, his final year in office, he SPEARHEADED a Medicare prescription drug bill (coincidentally drafted by drug industry lobbyists) which prohibited Medicare from negotiating bulk discounts with drug companies. BINGO! Instant profiteering by Bib PhRMA! Would love to have seen the stock quotes for drug companies the day that measure passed.

The new law made the U.S. the only developed country whose legislative body voted to subject its citizens to unprotected increases, making medications ranging from moderate to life-saving unaffordable to some American, as much as 2.4 times higher than the average price of nine other developed countries. It is also why other counties enjoy vastly reduced bulk prices.

I’m sure there was no connection to be made but prior to being named chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, Tauzin’s total contributions to his campaigns by the drug lobby was $5,000. After his appointment, he received $91,000 from drug companies—and, apparently, free travel  

Page 6 of Tauzin’s 2003 financial report shows that PhRMA flew him from Washinton, D.C. to Naples, Florida, on March 27 of that year and back to Washington three days later, on March 30. Less than two years later, he was CEO of the organization.

So, bottom line, Tauzin, whose congressional salary was $154,000, turned his back on Medicare recipients (read: the elderly) to take a lobbying job that paid him $2 million a year.

And while the Inflation Reduction Act that reinstated negotiations was expected to reduce the annual federal deficit by as much as $25 billion, there were, as usual, the back-door political deals.

With the assistance of another Louisiana congressman, Speaker Mike Johnson, the House in July 2025 passed the Repugnantcan policy bill that handed Big PhRMA a hefty $5 billion bonus by allowing more medications to be exempt from Medicare’s price negotiation program

According to Rebecca Robins, writing for The New York Times, under existing law, expensive drugs are exempt from price negotiations if they are approved to treat a single rare disease that affects fewer than 200,000 patients. Drugmakers, in a somewhat convoluted argument, have maintained that the negotiation requirement discourages the conducting of studies and seeking approval to treat a second rare disease, and that it ultimately deprives patients of new treatments.

In response, the new bill spares drugs that are approved to treat multiple rare diseases. They can still be subject to price negotiations later if they are approved for larger groups of patients, though the exemption delays those reduced prices.

Meanwhile, Trump attempts to again take credit for something positive accomplished by one of his predecessors. He’s done it with Obama and now he’s doing it with a Biden-passed bill.

In military parlance, that’s similar to stolen valor on the part of Cadet Bonespurs.

I have found myself wondering on several occasions why no one has chosen to run against Mike Johnson who masquerades as a Christian while willingly betraying every known principle of Christianity with his pathetic tenure as House Speaker.

Today, I am happy to announce that someone has stepped forward to challenge Johnson, who is little more than an extension of Donald Trump.

I am fully aware that Louisiana is a deep red state but that is only because of Democrats’ failure to turn out in sufficient numbers to make their voices heard and their needs felt.

Republicans in the Louisiana Legislature reconfigured the state’s congressional districts, absorbing Lincoln, Jackson, Winn and part of Rapides Parish from the 5th District to the new 4th, hoping by making it the most solidly red district, they would protect Johnson. That is reflected in the 68.4 percent white and 20.1 percent black makeup of the district and should bode well for Johnson.

But his weak leadership and partisan politics could yet be his achilles heel. Ethnicity notwithstanding, the state is still fairly balanced in party registration with Democrats holding a slight edge in numbers.

If disillusioned Republicans (and they do exist), and both white and black Democrats can lay aside any differences they may have long enough to realize we all share a common need for health care, jobs, affordable housing and food, the results could be astounding.

With that in mind, I give you Conrad Cable, a vegetable farmer from Marion, in Union Parish:

Following is his announcement:

The list of MAGA Republicans’ unfulfilled promises grows every day. The gold-covered scam is happening right before our eyes.
 
Gas costs at least $4.00/gallon because of the war in Iran. Our grocery shelves are empty as recall after recall from parasites and dangerous bacteria thanks to RFK Jr’s regulatory nightmares. Data centers and cuts to clean energy tax programs have raised our energy costs and are damaging our environment.
 
MAGA Republicans like Mike Johnson campaigned on the promise to make life easier for working people, but instead have done the exact opposite. When it comes to Trump’s reckless spending on golden monuments, reflecting pool makeovers, and the Iran War, they’re happy to deliver.

During a time when Americans can’t afford food, healthcare, groceries, or gas, we’re living through Trump’s golden age. For us? We’re living through MAGA Republicans’ golden hoax.
 
While my neighbors are struggling to put food on their table, Mike Johnson is standing by as Trump puts a fake golden sheen on our economy.
 
When millions of Americans lost healthcare coverage, the Big Ugly Bill gave billions to rebuilding the border wall.   

When Trump’s petty tariffs raised the cost of everything from new Nikes to lunchboxes, billion-dollar corporations got their money back, not the people who paid them.  

When gas prices hit a record high because of the Iran War, Mike Johnson wants to give Trump billions more to keep the unconstitutional conflict going.  

MAGA Republicans have no problem coughing up the cash for Trump, but when it comes to you and me, they slam the door shut.   

It doesn’t matter how many statues they cover in gold. This is all one big golden hoax that MAGA Republicans will continue until we stop them.  

I’m Conrad Cable. I’m a proud Democrat and a Louisiana farmer. I know what it’s like to lose health insurance and barely fill up my gas tank. MAGA Mike Johnson doesn’t.   

Louisiana’s 4th deserves someone who understands the value of the dollar — not someone who gives Donald Trump a pot of gold while we pay the price.

Book burning ceremony in Berlin shortly after Hitler assumed power

Member of Congress are notorious for passing laws that affect everyone but themselves. Case in point, they are not exempt from laws on such subjects as sexual harassment, health care and insider trading but they do have an annoying habit of being able to look the other way when there are obvious violations.

But one need only look back to the year 2024—just two short years ago—to see wholesale cases of insider trading by members of Congress in direct violation of the 2012 STOCK ACT prohibiting the use of non-public information for private profit.

And the examples of insider trading by one Donald J. Trump are far too numerous to even list here.

And LouisianaVoice and just about every Louisiana news outlet has carried stories of how Julia Letlow (1) violated the STOCK Act some 200 times by missing reporting deadlines on her trades and (2) invested in Meta, which is constructing a mammoth data center in her district, a transaction one outlet said carried A TRULY CROOKED STENCH.”

So, to put its collective purity on display just before the midterm elections, Congress on July 22 magnanimously passed the STOP INSIDER TRADING ACT (SITA) which increases penalties for insider trading in Congress from (wait for it) $200 to $2,000 or 10 percent of the value of the transaction, whichever is greater.

Think about that. With some trades netting hundreds of thousands of dollars, a 10 percent fine is little more than a broker’s fee—certainly not to be considered a deterrent. It’s a shell game, folks, and we’re the marks. Letlow is a great example of that: she voted for the bill even as she took full advantage of the soft enforcement of House ethics rules—all while running for the U.S. Senate.

You’d think that a good ethics bill would get solid bipartisan backing but alas, it barely passed, by a 232-198 vote.

Why, you ask, did it not get stronger support? Well, because House Republicans attached a rider that included the bulk of H.B. 9368 that would require photo ID to vote in federal elections. It’s all part of Trump’s SAVE America Act which is aimed at disenfranchising minorities and the elderly.

It also requires states to submit voter rolls to a federal database for review, a request with which Louisiana’s secretary of state has already complied.

Those with long memories will remember that a computerized database was instrumental in disqualifying tens of thousands of voters in Ohio in 2004. Ohio was a swing state that Bush won in a razor-thin majority over John Kerry. That particular data base was employed to ensure the placement of plentiful number of voting machines in districts favorable to Bush and to ration the machines to districts leaning toward Kerry. The result was people waiting as long as 16 hours to vote in the latter districts while just the opposite was the case in the others.

It’s no secret that the SAVE America Act is simply a repeat of that tactic and Trump, with a historically low approval rating, is desperate to keep Republican majorities in each chamber.

So, why not attach a rider onto a bill that looks like a strong ethics bill in order to get what Republicans want? It’s an old trick and one which only contributes to the existing state of gridlock.

If you seriously think for one nano-second that the bill, which, by the way, is doomed for failure in the Senate anyway, will discourage insider trading, you probably believe Trump was on Air Force One when it left Turkey.

By Paul Spillman

Can football season hurry up and get here? This summer of conflict and controversies just won’t quit and now another one has exploded in our own backyard.

Former LSU star quarterback and 2023 Heisman award winner Jayden Daniels has sent the university a cease and desist letter demanding LSU no longer use Daniels’ name, image, or likeness then followed that up with a demand LSU return its replica of Daniels’ Heisman trophy on display at the LSU Athletic complex.

What’s going on? Hurt feelings, mostly, coupled with a poor decision from a mom/agent with too much time on her hands. The spat surrounds the re-issuance of Daniels’ jersey number, 5, to sophomore cornerback D. J. Pickett. Daniels believes LSU promised him no one else would wear number 5, while Pickett was promised the jersey number during his recruitment.

LSU changed its policy on retiring jerseys in 2007. Prior to that a retired jersey meant the number was taken out of circulation, such as Billy Cannon’s number 20 or Pete Maravich’s number 23. But in 2007 LSU updated its policy to say that a player’s jersey would be retired but the number is not taken out of circulation and can be reissued at the discretion of the head coach.

In this case LSU head football coach Lane Kiffin approved Pickett switching from the number 3 he wore last season as a freshman to the number 5 Pickett was promised during his recruitment. Pickett was recruited to LSU under former coach Brian Kelly.

During a recent media availability Pickett said, “I’ve worn the number my whole life, since I was four years old. It’s the number I was promised. I wish Jayden the best. Good player, and he did real good here. That’s all.”

Kiffin didn’t add much, saying only that he had looked in to it and that if a recruit is promised something to sign he should receive what he was promised. During Pickett’s recruitment all the schools in his final list had agreed to the same stipulation, that Pickett could wear the number 5. Kiffin approved the switch.

Even though Kelly had promised the number to Pickett he had Picket wear number 3 last season because LSU did not get the buy-in from Daniels to reissue his number. Kelly had brought Daniels in as a transfer quarterback from Arizona State during Kelly’s first season as LSU head coach and Daniels won the Heisman in his second and final season at LSU passing for 3,812 yards and 40 touchdowns with a 72% completion rate and rushing for another 1,134 yards and 10 touchdowns. Only twelve college quarterbacks have ever passed for more than 3000 yards and rushed for more than 1000 yards in the same season. Kelly would naturally feel more of an obligation to Daniels than would Kiffin, who is obligated to winning now by keeping an All-American level cornerback from transferring over a jersey number.

According to reports both Kiffin and Pickett have spoken to Daniels but did not get Daniels agreement. Kiffin signed off on the switch anyway, prompting the response from the Daniels camp. Daniels’ agent is his mother, Regina Jackson.

The general consensus among observers is that it is Jackson more than Daniels pushing this issue. After the controversy became public Daniels, now the star quarterback for the NFL’s Washington Commanders, released a statement to the media expressing gratitude for his time at LSU and hoping for a “private resolution” adding his focus is on the Commanders’ upcoming season.

LSU has no rights to Daniels’ name, image, or likeness now that Daniels is no longer in school. A replica Heisman trophy is provided to the school of each winner, the school owns that replica, and LSU has no intention of surrendering its replica of Daniels’ Heisman trophy. It isn’t clear whether LSU is merchandising Daniels NIL by selling his jersey in the Gift Shop but it has reportedly been removed from display.

On social media the reaction has been overwhelmingly in favor of LSU, though not without plenty of cheap shots at the school and Kiffin. Because it’s Kiffin. And LSU. Brian Kelly is also taking his share of the heat for promising the number to Pickett but not following through and leaving it for Kiffin to deal with. Joe Burrow was even dragged in to it. Asked if he had any comments Burrow said he had only recently heard about it and hadn’t talked to anyone and declined to say anything more. But a persistent sportswriter asked if LSU had made him any promises and Burrow said he was told no one would ever wear his number again, then gave everybody an out by adding, “But you never know.”

Those who do side with Daniels point to the fact LSU’s other Heisman winners – Cannon and Burrow – have not had their numbers reissued. But as stated earlier Cannon’s number 20 is out of circulation and while Burrow’s number 9 isn’t it also hasn’t been worn since Burrow led LSU to the 2019 national championship.

And that brings up a topic most fans would rather avoid. Jayden Daniels had an amazing senior season at LSU. LSU has never had a quarterback with that particular skill set. If the Tiger defense had been up to the task LSU might have won another national championship in 2023. Instead that year’s team finished 9-3, then won a non-playoff bowl game in which Daniels did not participate. But Cannon won the Heisman the year after LSU won a national title and the same year as his Halloween night punt return to beat Ole Miss – a play iconic with LSU football. Burrow led an undefeated national championship team that is arguably among the best college teams ever. LSU has three Heisman winners but one is not like the other two – and no LSU fan wants to have that discussion. It’s unfortunate Daniels’ camp made the comparison in defense of their position.

But that’s what happens when the people around a star player have too much time on their hands and too much entitlement in their heads. From all appearances Jayden Daniels is a great guy and a great teammate. It would have been much better had Daniels released a statement expressing his disappoint with LSU but wishing Pickett a good season and challenging him to live up to the number. That would have been a classy move. Instead he’s stuck with his mom and her antics. And LSU is stuck, at least for the time being, with not being able to market a popular young NFL star as a recruiting tool. Everybody loses.

The start of the college football season cannot get here soon enough, but with three weeks still to go before LSU kicks off against Clemson on September 5 there is plenty of time for more bombshells and controversies. So grab a helmet, jump in the foxhole, and hope the season doesn’t blow up before it gets here.